Dan wrote:
> 1.  If you use a changeSorter to 'destroy' this changeset and 
> any later ones with numbers, then if you again ask for 
> updates, you should get all those beginning with the first 
> one you destroyed (you can confirm by asking 'about this 
> system' which will tell you what it THINKS is the highest update).

If that still works, then the following update

>3880versionUpdate-mir -- Michael Rueger -- 2 April 2001

is *really* broken :-) One of the ideas was to get rid of the dependency of
update numbers and change sets. So what you should really do is

	SystemVersion current highestUpdate: <updateNumber>

and then request updates again.

  - Andreas