Help! Unemployed
Richard A. O'Keefe
ok at atlas.otago.ac.nz
Mon Aug 13 04:45:17 UTC 2001
"Andrew C. Greenberg" <werdna at mucow.com> wrote:
I'll own up to ignorance on this. When did FORTRAN become Fortran?
>From the comp.lang.fortran FAQ (e.g. http://www.fortran.com/info.html):
FORTRAN is generally the preferred spelling for discussions of
versions of the language prior to the current one ('90').
Fortran is the spelling chosen by X3J3 and WG5.
ISO 1539:1991 and its ANSI counterpart X3.198-1992 consistently
employ the spelling "Fortran" to refer to the language being defined.
You will, however, find a lot of references to "Fortran 77".
(Note that the current Fortran standard may be Fortran 95, I don't know
if F2k is out yet.)
Is that a well-settled convention now? Has BASIC become Basic as well?
>From the same question in the same FAQ:
There was an effort to "standardize" on spelling
of programming languages just after F77 becamse a standard.
The rule: if you say the letters, it is all caps (APL);
if you pronounce it as a word, it is not (Cobol, Fortran,
Ada). See, for example, the definitive article
describing Fortran 77 in the Oct 1978 issue of [CACM].
The timing was such that FORTRAN got put on the standard
itself, though many always after that have referred to it
as Fortran 77.
So yes, I imagine the standard name is indeed "Basic", not "BASIC".
However, it is up to the particular programming language communities
whether they accept such a change; the Fortran community _has_ accepted
this change. Whether the BASIC and COBOL communities have, I know not.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|