[Enh] and [Bug] new SUnit code for the update stream
rwithers at quallaby.com
Mon Aug 27 19:09:14 UTC 2001
Hi Andres, Hola!
Yes Linda is here, and other directions too. Thanks for the support!
Since SWT, really represents the bleeding edge on these two items (Events
and SUnit), could you post separate changesets for them, please? It seems
the approach being taken may be one of slow intergration, which is a good
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andres Valloud [mailto:sqrmax at prodigy.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:43 AM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [Enh] and [Bug] new SUnit code for the update stream
> Hi Rob.
> It's been some time, I see Linda is becoming real. Go for it!
> I have some quick comments about these updates.
> > Sunit @ Camp Smalltalk, was updated for Squeak.
> I scanned the code for major fixes already available for
> SUnit, just to
> make sure. I didn't find them in your files. For instance, exception
> handling is still broken. There is a Squeak SUnit 3.0 port in SWT 0.5
> which includes all the fixes not present here. There is a
> newer version
> of events in SWT 0.5, too. Ummm...
> BTW... the new SWT 0.6 release should be up in the swiki
> today if I stop
> having trouble uploading stuff to it. If not, I'll just
> setup a website
> to hold the files. I updated the swiki yesterday, so now there's some
> text describing what's new.
> Events and SUnit in particular didn't change in SWT 0.6.
> There's a hidden value in mirroring the files somewhere else:
> the SWT swiki does not support resuming broken downloads. I
> don't know
> about other people, but I always had a lot of trouble downloading and
> uploading files. And this SWT release is about 7MB zipped...
> (or 5.5Mb
> with Rar). I tried uploading 1Mb rar volumes yesterday but they would
> be slow and abort way before being complete :(.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Squeak-dev