Ned Konz wrote:
> 
> On Saturday 24 February 2001 07:34, Stephan Rudlof wrote:
> 
> > > No. Just as it says: "all methods that are categorized in my
> > > superclasses".
> >
> > Is this feature feature "categorize from superclasses" for all classes?
> 
> I don't understand.

Not a wonder, since this case would be totally different from the next
one...

> There is a local one that you can get to from the browser
> that just affects the current class. It assigns categories to uncategorized
> methods in the current class by looking up the superclass chain. The first
> category it finds (if any) for each uncategorized method is used.
> 

The next one:

> > If no: What's the difference between "recategorize all" and "categorize
> > from superclasses" then?
> 
> "Recategorize all" first forgets all the categories that have been assigned
> to methods in the current class, then does a "categorize from superclasses".

So it's possible that there a more *uncategorized* methods as before, in
opposite to "categorize from superclasses".

But this contradicts a former statement by you:

> > > * recategorize all
> > > Recategorize all methods that are categorized in my superclasses; leave
> > > the rest as uncategorized.
> >
> > Does this also mean moving already categorized methods in the actual class
> > to uncategorized, if they aren't categorized in any superclass?
> 
> No. Just as it says: "all methods that are categorized in my superclasses".

, since my question here seems to be answered with 'Yes' here, isn't it?

Thanks, I think I've gotten it now!

Greetings,

Stephan

> 
> There are also a couple of methods in SystemDictionary that can be used to
> "clean up" all the classes in your system.
> 
> --
> Ned Konz
> currently: Stanwood, WA
> email:     ned at bike-nomad.com
> homepage:  http://bike-nomad.com

-- 
Stephan Rudlof (sr at evolgo.de)
   "Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis.
    You can't simply say, 'Today I will be brilliant.'"
    -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3