Squeak slowdowns (Unix 3.1)
Lex Spoon
lex at cc.gatech.edu
Fri Feb 23 16:51:00 UTC 2001
To clarify, does it *stay* in the bad state, once it gets there?
-Lex
Ned Konz <ned at bike-nomad.com> wrote:
> I'm using the 3.0pre2 Unix VM under Linux 2.4.0, with a 3.1 image.
> What I'm finding is that:
>
> * normally things run pretty well; if I do a Message Tally I see about 80%
> of the time being spent in Delay>>wait. The CPU usage is below 5% for Squeak.
>
> * sometimes, though, Squeak uses about 100% of a CPU, and if I do a similar
> Message Tally, I see 75% of the time being spent in
> EventSensor>>nextEventFromQueue.
>
> It can go from the "good" state to the "bad" state just by being left alone
> with no interaction.
>
> Saving the image, quitting, and restarting fixes this problem.
>
> Any suggestions?
> --
> Ned Konz
> currently: Stanwood, WA
> email: ned at bike-nomad.com
> homepage: http://bike-nomad.com
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|