This appears to be madness!

I can understand the need to push ahead to version 3.0
for a CD release, but what is the rationale to so quickly
jump to 3.1 without first fixing bugs?

There was never really a 3.0 alpha or else 3.0 is really
an alpha for 3.1?

Do the version numbers _mean_ anything or are they
just arbitrary snapshots based on whimsy?



--
   **************************************************
   Jeff Szuhay              A randomly-directed 
   www.szuhay.org           chaotical wetware pattern 
   jeff at szuhay.org          recognizer/generator.	


   ... But they are useless:
   They can only give you answers. 
      -- Picasso, on computers.