Squeak V3 (was: Final call for 2.9 updates)

Tim Rowledge tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
Sat Jan 27 19:15:09 UTC 2001

Henrik Gedenryd wrote:
> Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> > There were a lot of modifications proposed that would justify a new major
> > version when finished: Morphic clean up, Network streaming support, new
> > method format, actually using Exceptions, block closures, you name it.
> Eh, that sounds more like 7.0 to me ;-) Anyway, having version 2.11 etc. is
> at least as bad imo. How does someone new know that this is not 2.1.1?
> There should be the new CompiledMethod format, as a major version number has
> been said to signify image incompatibility.

It's probably a couple of weeks work to bring this up to date; I don't
even know if the Systemtracer still works in 2.9. I can do it, but I'm
certainly not going to spend time on it unless I know it will be used.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list