Jesse,


> Looked at another way, while it is true that duplicating structures is
> often bad, the two structures in question here are not representing
> precisely the same relationships.  The ivar structure represents a
> logical structure of parts having specific known functions, while the
> submorph structure is more of a graphical assembly structure.  They're
> not, strictly speaking, duplicating information.
>
> -Jesse
>

OK, you guys have convinced me. From now on, I'll store all of my morphs as
ivar in the owning morphs, in case I ever have to get at one.

Jim