[BUG] Bounds of rotated Morphs are incorrect inside GeeMailMorphs

Randal L. Schwartz merlyn at stonehenge.com
Tue Mar 6 14:27:20 UTC 2001


>>>>> "Bert" == Bert Freudenberg <bert at isg.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> writes:

Bert> The real problem IMHO is the use of absolute coordinates in
Bert> Morphic.

I've seen this come up before (maybe in Mark's book or on this list).
Just how much of a pain would it be to change this to use relative
coords?

I suspect there'd be at least a tiny slowdown as each morph has to ask
all its owner morphs about its current x/y, but doesn't it sorta have
to do that anyway if there are rotate/transform morphs in the middle?

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list