I believe that a company formed in the Open Source tradition but focused on
documenting and supporting Squeak will lead to greater acceptance among people
who are not hard-core Squeakers (which means I include virtually nobody who's
_active_ on this list) _and_ corporations who insist on that kind of activity
before they buy into Open Source solutions.

--- "Andrew C. Greenberg" <werdna at mucow.com> wrote:
> >Exactly my point. I'm simply saying that before I see it being likely that
> we
> >can get a company or consortium interested in forming something that 
> >looks like a Red Hat for the Squeak universe, we need to resolve the 
> >questions of
> >modularity and extensibility that currently surround the evolving image.
> 
> Why would it be advantageous to have a Red Hat for the squeak universe?
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/