Are morphs the components of Squeak - a la JavaBeans?
Tom
tmb at lumo.com
Mon Mar 26 21:14:15 UTC 2001
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:24:06PM +0200, Roel Wuyts wrote:
> About the interface question: suppose we define an interface for
> Smalltalk-beans (based on conventions of course, maybe the current Javabeans
> interface can be used as inspiration for things to include/omit). Couldn't
> this be enough to propel us already ahead ?
>
> We could make a swiki page describing the interface, and we could try
> writing components that adhere to this interface. Such components should be
> interoperable.
I think this would be great. In fact, I don't think much new would have
to be invented; most of the conventions already seem to exist in Squeak,
they merely need to be documented in a single place, outside the code.
Cheers,
Thomas.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|