Packaging Squeak for Debian GNU/Linux
Ned Konz
ned at bike-nomad.com
Wed May 23 15:17:19 UTC 2001
On Wednesday 23 May 2001 04:12, Andrew C. Greenberg wrote:
> The SqueakL from Apple expressly contemplates using different language,
> but requires that no new license be less protective of Apple than
> SqueakL. There are other limitations as well. Accordingly, a
> Apple/fontless Squeak could probably be licensed without the Apple
> Fonts. For the same reason, I doubt you could remove the export
> requirements.
I have been curious about that. I thought the US embargo of, say, Cuba was an
economic thing. Is it illegal for USAmericans to supply Cubans with _free_
software?
Just wondering... anyone know?
--
Ned Konz
currently: Stanwood, WA
email: ned at bike-nomad.com
homepage: http://bike-nomad.com
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|