Hey Lex.
I knew FilteredCeleste was good stuff, but I hadn't thought of that use
case...
I really think it's a good addition to Celeste.

Do you intend to put the finishes on it soon enough for an integration
soon?
Or do you prefer to wait for after the next integration to add it in
peace?

BTW, IMHO it'd be a good idea to leave it as a subclass for a while, so
people can choose which mode they prefer.

Daniel

"Lex Spoon" <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> 
> > I actually don't miss the column based sorting much (this is not always
> > true though, and it would be nice to have in Celeste).  Using the
> > Subject and Participant filter, I can quickly find most historical
> > messages with ease.   A neat trick you can play is to also use the
> > custom filter to select the messages you want.  For instance, to display
> > the messages which are greater than 100kb, create a custom filter that
> > uses
> > 	m textLength > 100000
> > And obviously that can be combined with the Subject and Participant
> > filter.
> 
> Yes.  Filters really rock.  People, please try to learn a little
> Celeste-Do before assuming that it should be just like other mail
> readers.  If you want mutt, then by all means use mutt.
> 
> With my filters patch, you can even have multiple filters of each kind
> -- now multiple categories becomes a truly useful feature.  "show me
> sent messages to the squeak list" is extremely easy.
> 
> -Lex