yes! please, please, please include sUnit3.0 in the new release!!

david

At 08:10 AM 10/2/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Dan and the Harvesters,  (it sounds like oldies but goodies!  ;-)
>
>There's no doubt about it, it's great seeing all of those community changes 
>go though.  It looks like there were some nice fixes in there.  In light of 
>the beta, following by such slicing and dicing, please consider putting the 
>following changesets into the 3.1alpha stream.
>
>[3.0 SUnit]
>I have attached the SUnit 3.0 changesets, with changes to remove the 
>existing, deprecated Classes and methods from the 2.8 version in the 
>current image.  All SUnit tests pass.
>
>[NuBlu Events code plus image repairs]
>The second set of changesets are the new event code, from the NuBlu 
>book.  I changed the top level actionMap dictionary to be a 
>WeakKeyIdentityDictionary, like the EventsFields class var used to hold.  I 
>also went through the image and changed all of the references to the old 
>events code to this set.  There wasn't a lot of use of this mechanism, but 
>some in Morphic.    Please consider putting these into the pre 3.2 stream, 
>also.    This framework is used by ModSqueak, which is still being looked 
>at, especially for the Declarative model it introduces.  This changeset 
>would help ease that effort, and perhaps help us combine the two Module 
>mechanisms.
>
>cheers,
>Rob
>
>PS.  I recently switched from Outlook to Eudora, so I fervently hope that 
>there isn't any HTML nonsense going on in this email.  I told eudora three 
>times!   Please let me know if I;ve mangled it once again.

--
David Farber
dfarber at numenor.com