Why we should remove {} from Squeak
David N. Smith (IBM)
dnsmith at watson.ibm.com
Tue Oct 2 15:12:30 UTC 2001
At 2:11 +0300 10/2/01, danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:
>...
>
>See my proposal in another message on this thread - we should lose the
>idea of "compile time created" objects, and use tools to make caching
>easier.
>...
>
>Daniel
Oh!
I didn't find your other thread, so all I have to go on is this. So, you propose no blocks? No compiled methods? No integers, or strings, or floats?
Or aren't blocks going to be objects anymore? Or integers, like in Java.
Maybe you could point me to that other proposal so I can go read it...
Dave
BTW, I always thought progress came from new ideas that don't quite fit with current notions, but that are useful. In programming languages they might spark creation of a new theoretical framework eventually, rather than the old framework forbidding use of the idea. Am I confused?
--
_______________________________
David N. Smith
IBM T J Watson Research Center
Hawthorne, NY
dnsmith at watson.ibm.com
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|