Is this a bug? (Morph)

Andreas Raab Andreas.Raab at gmx.de
Sat Oct 13 02:30:43 UTC 2001


Also you should mention that fullBounds are used to indicate that the morph
needs to recompute its layout (when fullBounds == nil) - the assumption
being that the layout process may change the size of that morph by
re-arranging the children.

Cheers,
  - Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org]On Behalf Of Bob
> Arning
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 6:54 PM
> To: laheadle at cs.uchicago.edu; squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: Is this a bug? (Morph)
>
>
> On 12 Oct 2001 18:57:51 -0400 Lyn A Headley
> <laheadle at cs.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> >    Bob> - the first #changed notes that the current bounds may need
> >    Bob> to be redrawn (especially when the morph gets smaller and
> >
> >This reminded me of a question I've had for a while.  What's the
> >difference between bounds and fullbounds?
>
> Lyn,
>
> - bounds is the rectangle in which the morph itself is drawn.
> - fullBounds is the rectangle that includes the morph AND all
> its submorphs. USUALLY, this is the same, but fullBounds may
> occasionally be larger than bounds.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
>





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list