really silly question
Karl Ramberg
karl.ramberg at chello.se
Mon Sep 3 18:39:25 UTC 2001
Marcel Weiher wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 2, 2001, at 10:19 PM, Lex Spoon wrote:
> >
> > By the way, there is a nice generalization of the above with:foo:
> > pattern. It looks like this:
> >
> > (firstArray with: secondArray) collect: [ :combo | combo first + combo
> > second ]
>
> I have to admit I like
>
> firstArray collect + secondArray each
>
> better, though it is far from perfect, because the structure of the
> intended is still visible in the lexical structure of the code (LHS +
> RHS), even if both the LHS and the RHS are a little mucked up.
>
The best one so far ( I think) is
firstArray + secondArray
which works like a charm :-)
But you still have to know that the arrays have equal size.
Karl
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|