Could you poste your version on the squeak Foundation wiki ;)
I was planning to do that but I'm ___really___ overloaded. I just the
emails.

on 29/9/01 8:45 pm, Hans-Martin Mosner at hm.mosner at cityweb.de wrote:

> Ok, so I've used Stef's Ginsu port, and with very little patching it ran
> very nicely in 3.1.
> Here's what I did:
> 1. implement a method AlignmentMorph>>inset: (just returns self)
> 2. changed UpdatingMenuItemMorph>>enablement: to ask the target and not
> the wordingProvider
> 3. implemented ChooserMorph>>choose... with additional args
> (buttons+values+lines), which are silently ignored
> 4. changed MethodDefinition>>classReferences and ...>>globalReferences
> to use isVariableBinding instead of isKindOf: Association. BTW, does
> anybody know why the various Associationlike subclasses of LookupKey are
> not subclasses of Association?
> 
> Now I'm fooling around with the mechanism which moves definitions into
> and out of the Unmanaged package. It seems to do the wrong thing for
> clusters, because classes defined within different packages within the
> same cluster can't see each other. Seems like at least one of
> visibleClasses, allVisibleClasses, visibleClassNames and
> allVisibleClassNames is broken :-( Without really understanding the
> intended function of these messages, it looks to me that the overloaded
> definitions of visibleClasses in Cluster and Package shadows the one
> which seems most sensible to me, in Module...
> 
> Cheers,
> Hans-Martin
> 
>