Ken,

> How much of this am I misunderstanding
> and how much is just broke?

The first part is misunderstood and the second broke. Note that
#addMorph: will add the morph at the _beginning_ of the submorph chain,
thus the text morph with number 3 is - although the last in your adding
sequence - the first in the morph chain. And naturally the first object
in the chain of morphs comes out top-most. Change your code to use
#addMorphBack: and it'll come out all right.

The second part (with #bottomToTop) is broke.

Cheers,
  - Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ken Causey
> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 12:00 AM
> To: Squeak Devel List
> Subject: TableLayout not quite working right?
> 
> 
> I'm using 3.2g-4811.  Some code:
> 
> r _ RectangleMorph new
> 	layoutPolicy: (TableLayout new);
> 	vResizing: #shrinkWrap;
> 	hResizing: #shrinkWrap;
> 	listDirection: #topToBottom.
> {'1'. '2'. '3'} do: [ :item |
> 	r addMorph:
> 		(StringMorph new contents: item).
> 	r addMorph:
> 		(TextMorph new contents: 'Number ', item;
> 			borderWidth: 1;
> 			autoFit: false;
> 			extent: 200 at 15)].
> r openInHand.
> 
> First of all, this seems to render upside down.  The 
> StringMorph 1 is on
> the bottom and the TextMorph with 'Number 3' is on the top.  
> Change the
> RectangleMorph's listDirection: to #bottomToTop, now the order seems
> correct (or actually wrong again, but correct for 
> #topToBottom) but now
> the vResizing: #shrinkWrap is not honored.  The RectangleMorph has its
> default size and can be resized.
> 
> How much of this am I misunderstanding and how much is just broke?
> 
> Ken Causey
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>