Who has no job? (was Re: O'Reilly Squeak book?)
Bruce Cohen
brucecohen at qwest.net
Thu Apr 18 20:59:23 UTC 2002
At 8:32 AM -0400 4/18/02, Stephan B. Wessels wrote:
>Yes that is probably true.
>
>However I always found ways to use Squeak in my former work.
>
>Having no income is really different from being denied use of a tool
>however. It causes a different kind of stress. :)
Indeed. But you can always ignore commandments of this sort. You
know the old saw, "It is better to ask for forgiveness than beg for
permission."
Although I have to admit that I had to leave one job (at Tektronix,
no less!) because I refused to spit on Smalltalk, and actually
suggested that it might be good for something. The engineering
manager of the division had declared fatwah on Smalltalk (he was a
C++ person), and I didn't understand the depths of his zeal.
Bruce
>
> - Steve
>
>On 4/18/02 4:51 AM, "Cees de Groot" <cg at cdegroot.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim Rowledge <tim at sumeru.stanford.edu> said:
>>>> Actually, I might be interested myself. Being unemployed helps.
>>> So just how many of us are unemployed right now? Seems like an awful
>>> lot of us....
>>>
>> Probably if you count in everyone who has a job but isn't allowed to use
> > Smalltalk there, 99% ...
--
"The joke is over when the head falls off." - Scotts' proverb
=========
Bruce Cohen
5908 SW California St.
Portland, OR 97219
brucecohen at qwest.net
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|