Ken Causey <ken at ineffable.com> wrote:

> 
> OK, that's very interesting as this does work.  But this indicates even
> more clearly that the MailMessage instances returned as a result of
> MailMessage>>parts are apparently not correctly formed, since they are
> not functionally equivalent to instantiating an instance manually from
> the text using MailMessage class>>from:.
> 


Can you be more explicit, like with some example code?  There are two
#parts floating around, you know -- I bet this is what you bumped into. 
MIMEDocument>>parts is doing guesswork, and it isn't surprising that a
complex message can trip it up.  Now that we have MailMessage>>parts,
this method should probably go away.  At the least, it should be renamed
#guessParts.  Before doing so, however, we just need to figure out if any
code is still using the old versian.



-Lex