Oops..

Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
> <Off-list>
> 
> Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> > 
> > This sounds as if we have some common ground. Good. Reading your
> > message, I was concerned that people would want to have a class object
> > with zero references to other classes regardless of the context - that I
> > think would be very unwise.
> Well, you and I have been exchanging emails on this topic on and off for
> about half a year now (looking at the first "requirements for using
> modules"), so it would be a BIG surprise if we were completely out of
> sync...
> 
> Daniel