Andrew C. Greenberg wrote:

>
>
>> But in any case, it certainly *is* the current opinion of many that 
>> LGPL is certainly good for more than "just VM plugins".  I am one of 
>> those people.  I strongly disagree with the statement on SqueakMap 
>> that states it that way (though I personally completely agree with 
>> Andrew's statement about GPL code).
>
>
> Many?  How many is that?  How many have seriously considered LGPL in 
> monolithic images for widely distributed open source Smalltalks?


It wouldn't be appropriate to name specific names within a public forum, 
however suffice it to say that I'm not aware of a single prominent "Camp 
Smalltalk" person who believes LGPL is a problem.  You can google Camp 
Smalltalk discussions and see some of it yourself.

There are likewise a number of prominent Cincom folks who don't think it 
is a problem.  Pick a Cincomer, then google on GLORP plus their name, 
and you can see for yourself.

And this doesn't even mention private conversations about the topic.

Nevin