Squeak practical use?
David N. Smith (IBM)
dnsmith at watson.ibm.com
Mon Jan 28 20:35:17 UTC 2002
At 9:39 +0200 1/28/02, Yoel Jacobsen wrote:
>Hello all,
>
> I'm a computer professional, doing system architecture and implementation of medium to large directory, messaging and other (mainly Solaris oriented) systems I have this inquiry sitting in the back of my head for a long while.
>
> I do LOVE playing with Squeak and implemented some nice ideas (currently - ASN.1 encoder/decoder to form a basis for an LDAP implementation).
>
> However, when it gets to practical, day to day programming I just fill that other languages (mainly - Python) is more practical. I can transfer my ideas into a running program in a short while. When analyzing why it is so, I have reached the following conclusions:
>
> ...SNIP...
>
> So, the inquiry - Are you using Squeak for any practical use? Please tell me only about resource intensive applications (currency conversion does not count as a practical application).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yoel
Yoel:
Does a large (10,000 lines of fileout) application, packaged to hide everything but the application, and in use by 7 year olds in a large school system count? (It's part of a study with another phase starting soon.) I hope to have details on my web site later this spring/summer; lawyers move slowly here.
Dave
--
_______________________________
David N. Smith
IBM T J Watson Research Center
Hawthorne, NY
dnsmith at watson.ibm.com
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|