Is TestInterpreterPlugin a good name?
Tim Rowledge
tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
Mon Jul 22 16:39:39 UTC 2002
On Monday, July 22, 2002, at 07:35 AM, Ned Konz wrote:
> Are TestInterpreterPlugin (and its sister class TestCodeGenerator)
> aptly named?
Definitely not! It was quite reasonable when Andy was initially
implementing them but they really ought to have been renamed before going
into the image. It's not too late!
For a suitable name, consider SmartInterpreter* - since they add some
useful smarts to the process.
tim
--
tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|