Andreas Raab wrote:
> 
> > > The zip file is now in the same place as the .sit one.
> >
> >       Why waste space and risk errors by using multiple
> > archival formats?
> 
> Unless we're really low on disk space on this server (in which case I'd
> rather remove some of the older stuff) I like a bit of redundancy here.
> Also, it gives people their pick - in fact I'd argue that we should
> probably have a gzipped tar-ball as well ;-)

Also you loose the hfs creator and file type with zip and gz.

Karl