Smalltalk-72 [Was: threads]
Lex Spoon
lex at cc.gatech.edu
Fri Mar 1 00:48:35 UTC 2002
> > I couldn't agree more. Don't you think it might be useful to augment
> squeak by also providing
> > a scripting language (sans-frameworks and image) that fit this bill?
>
> If no one is interested in this. I'll take it ;-)
>
> But I need advice from both of you from perspective of ST72 and
> SmallScript.
>
> What does it take to achieve this ?
>
> I like to throw a script to Squeak and automagically rewarded
> with a FreeCell game without loading a frameowork/image.
>
People have nibbled at issues like this in the past. Here are two Swiki
pages that are relevant:
"FAQ: Squeak Executables"
http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/778
"Writing scripts"
http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/425
If you just try to use Squeak in one of these ways, you will probably
find some rough edges very quickly!
Oh, you'll probably also be interested in
ProjectLauncher>>startUpAfterLogin, too, which is where command-line
arguments get processed inside Squeak.
-Lex
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|