I think it would be great (and entirely possible) to have a 100% squeak
web browser that had the important features, compatibility, and speed of
the more popular web browsers.

However, it would take a lot of work and I don't think it's worth the
time and effort.  I think the time would be better spent working on
something new (like morphic for example).

But, I also think that Squeak needs to become a platform where people
are comfortable spending all of their time.  That means that it needs a
good web browser, email client, etc.

So, if Gecko isn't too hard to integrate and will result in a more
compatible and capable web browser, then I'm all for it.  I'd certainly
use it.

- Stephen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> Behalf Of Gvran Hultgren
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:52 AM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: Scamper & Gecko ?
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> --- Aaron J Reichow <reic0024 at d.umn.edu> wrote:
> [BIG SNIP of informative stuff]
> > Also, while much better than Scamper and still way cool, the 
> > capabilities of Gecko/Mozilla go beyond it.  I'd like to have both, 
> > frankly. :)
> 
> I can second that! :-)
> 
> regards, Göran
> 
> =====
> Göran Hultgren, goran.hultgren at bluefish.se
> GSM: +46 70 3933950, http://www.bluefish.se
> "Department of Redundancy department." -- ThinkGeek
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/
> 
>