[BC] Trouble with pre-built image
Maurice Rabb
m3rabb at stono.com
Wed Mar 20 00:07:29 UTC 2002
At 5:38 PM -0500 3/19/02, Anthony Hannan wrote:
>Maurice Rabb <m3rabb at stono.com> wrote:
> > ERROR "getting sourceCode: UndefinedObject class errorNoDecompilerYet?"
>
>The decompiler hasn't been implemented yet, that is why your getting the
>above error. This only gets in the way when looking at DoIt methods,
>other methods have source pointers and don't need the decompiler. I
>want to enhance DoIt methods so they hold onto their source as well and
>don't need the decompiler. The decompiler is non-trivial and I'm
>waiting until
>my new bytecodes, intermediate representation, and parse node changes are
>well established before spending time on the decompiler.
> Also you may have noticed you can't step past the halt. This is a bug
>and I will try to fix it in the next couple of weeks.
Hmm, the DoIts problem can be worked around by putting halts in the
methods that I am working on. However, the not being able to step
past the halts -- I'm not sure how to debug (effectively) until
stepping past halt is fixed. Anthony, how do _you_ debug in the
meantime?
>
> > I performed the following:
>>
> > SystemVersion current
>> version: 'Squeak3.3alpha';
>> highestUpdate: 4653;
> > updates removeAllSuchThat: [:each | each > 4653].
>Note: I assume your cascade above is pseudo-code since you can't send a
>message ("removeAllSuchThat:") to a message ("updates") in a cascade.
Ah you caught me there! That is the pseudo-code of what I did.
Technically even though Squeak won't eat it, it is legal ANSI code.
Thanks,
Maurice
--
===================================================================
Maurice Rabb Stono Technologies, LLC 773.281.6003
"enlightened design, invisible technology"
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|