I have two thoughts pulling in different directions:
* Though tools need to have some way to announce their presence in the
image, users should also have a way to customize what is shown where.
* KISS, and get on with everything else there is to do.

If anyone has something better than the current scheme, you're welcome. 

I consider the current situation almost good enough, certainly good
enough to proceed pulling out wires.

Daniel

Lex Spoon <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:
> > you get the idea. This simply depends on the load order, which is
> > simple, but butt-ugly and inconsistent to the user.
> > 
> 
> Well, alphabetizing will help with the former.  I don't know about the
> rest.  Surely, however,  "changes sorter" and "email reader" should be
> in separate areas of the menu.
> 
> Really, which morphs are special enough to be "apps", anyway?  As
> opposed to "tools" or just regular "morphs"?  If the question is
> unanswerable, perhaps we could move everything into the "objects"
> browser and simplify things a bit.
> 
> I dunno.  How to arrange everything seems to lead back to the question
> of what Squeak is, exactly.
> 
> 
> Lex