Julian Fitzell <julian at beta4.com> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Yup, my solution definitely requires DVS to work.  Might be another 
> incentive for people to use it though! ;)  Seriously, though, the whole 

True.

> point of DVS is so you know what package code belongs in.  If you don't 
> use DVS, by implication, you *don't* know what package it belongs in so 
> people can't really expect that kind of extra functionality.
>
> If you can make it work for changesets somehow, then great, but you did 
> say that changesets would be supported in SM, not that they would 
> support *all* features... that's just not reasonable.

I agree. Let's make it work with DVS and otherwise let the user pick one
of the installed packages from a menu based on his/her own judgement. It
will still be an improvement.

regards, Göran