Squeak 3.4: should we change to CrLfFileStream as default?
Michael Rueger
m.rueger at acm.org
Sat Nov 16 23:10:52 UTC 2002
Ned Konz wrote:
>>How about folding the functionality into FileStream itself? In
>>situations where you want to force specific line endings, you can
>>still say so.
>
>
> Perhaps.
>
> Unfortunately, the implementation of CrLfFileStream still has some
> overhead on both reads and writes if it's in binary mode.
Maybe we should wait with any decision until we a better idea if and how
we might want to refactor the Stream classes anyways.
Flow does it and there are also a few experimental codelets sitting on
my hard drive, right next to the directory and http rewrite ;-)
Michael
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|