Hi Serge and Andrew!

(I included you Andrew because perhaps you have a simple answer)

I (Goran) wrote:
[SNIP]
> > So you don't "combine" the licenses - instead you just say:
> > 
> > This code is available under the SqueakL or under the MIT license. Pick
> > any you like. (And of course you need to include the license in
> > question. Don't forget to add your name and year to the MIT template).

And Serge:
> It means i need to put the two licences inside the changeset ?
> or have two changesets one with SqueakL, one with MIT License ?

Hmmm, well, I think it would suffice to have a note in the preamble that
the code is under both those licenses and an url to a page somewhere
with more info including the full license texts. But I am not sure -
perhaps Andrew could answer this one.

So Andrew: Do we in general need to include the full license somehow in
a downloadable package? Or does a note with a url suffice?

[SNIP]
> > PS. Perhaps we should add MIT to the licenses to choose from at SM. Note
> > that you can select multiple licenses - just use the select box further
> > down to add more categories.
> 
> Please do.

Yes, I will ask for other category proposals in another posting too.

regards, Göran