danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:
> 
> 2. map1 really is not available, so SM is automatically falling back to
> map2, which is a good thing. It is also letting you know this, which
> might be superflous. Maybe it should just Transcript show: it?

My two cents on this item is that it sounds like a perfect message for the Transcript.  Most people won't care about this info and might even be distracted by it, but the information would be in the Transcript if you really needed it.

(I'll try to test the latest SM & loader tonight.)

- Doug Way
  dway at riskmetrics.com