More on the deadlock
Lex Spoon
squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Wed Oct 9 20:33:13 UTC 2002
"Bill Schwab" <BILLS at ANEST4.ANEST.UFL.EDU> wrote:
> (2) Re "missing" processes, I can explain at least one. The idle
> process calls a primitive to yield to the OS (or do nothing) and
> appears never to actually wait on a semaphore, so the
> #printCallStacks algorithm does not detect it. Seem reasonable?
>
Hmm, that sounds right. It will be runnable, however -- simply at a
very low priority. You should check the array of runnable processes in
your print function.
Lex
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|