[BUG?]Upgrading 3.2 to 3.3alpha

Roger Vossler rvossler at qwest.net
Sun Sep 1 22:16:09 UTC 2002


Hi Dan,

I'd be particularly interested in your thoughts about how block 
closures, and a number of related
issues, are going to be integrated into Squeak and when. Also, there 
was another surge of interest
in modules in June (305 messages) which seemed to have decayed off 
rather rapidly (49 messages
in July and 6 messages in August). While everyone may be either on 
vacation or furiously writing
code, I'd like to hear your thoughts on where the modules effort is 
headed, when it is likely to happen,
and what the final (or interim) results are likely to look like. 
Comments from others would also be
welcome.

Cheers, Roger.....

On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 05:01 AM, Dan Ingalls wrote:

> "Roger Vossler" <rvossler at qwest.net> asked...
>
>> I thought that Squeak Central was in control of the update process. 
>> Who exactly is the maintainer
>> of the 3.2 fork and why did this fork take place? Is Squeak Central 
>> now out of the loop?
>
> Hi, Roger -
>
> Sorry about the misleading use of words.  That maintainer was me.  I 
> had originally worded my reply as though Andrew had been maintaining 
> his own image, and it said something like "you chose NO".  Then I 
> realized this is the case for any 3.2, so I changed it to this 
> impersonal reference to the election of the fork to 3.2 in update > 4653.
>
> And to answer the bigger question, no, SQC is not out of the loop (as 
> far as we know ;-).  On the contrary I expect various of us to be more 
> active again as we get into the fall.  I'll try to write down my 
> thoughts about some of the current activities and how they might play 
> together in a coherent manner as we go forward.
>
> 	- Dan
> --------------------------

[snip]




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list