<QUOTE>
This was done for Comanche 4 / Swiki Beta 8. You would need to unpack the
zip into the swiki directory, file in the two change sets and it should
work. But it has been 2 years since I touched this, I don't quite
remember. If anyone wants to port this to a current Swiki version
(shouldn't be too hard), please go ahead ;-)
</QUOTE>

With 3.2 latest update and 'Moon Harvest' Comanche, filing in
'getfields-bf.1.cs' encountered MNU 'methodsFor:stamp:'

    Cheers,

    PhiHo.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at isg.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [ANN] Cash For Documentation project


> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, PhiHo Hoang wrote:
>
> > Hi Bert,
> >
> >     Do you have a guide to install this Browser for Comanche/Swiki.
>
> This was done for Comanche 4 / Swiki Beta 8. You would need to unpack the
> zip into the swiki directory, file in the two change sets and it should
> work. But it has been 2 years since I touched this, I don't quite
> remember. If anyone wants to port this to a current Swiki version
> (shouldn't be too hard), please go ahead ;-)
>
> Anyway, the Good Stuff is in the "actions" directory. The formatting of
> Text into HTML is done by my HtmlStreamWrapper class.
>
> >     Where can I get all the packages needed ?
>
> Everything that was needed on top of Swiki is in the zip.
>
> >     BTW, can I view the bytecodes for a method ?
>
> No. One would have to invent some interface for switching between text and
> byte code view in HTML. Something like the instance/class switch but more
> complicated I guess.
>
> >     Cheers,
> >
> >     PhiHo.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at isg.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
> > To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 4:38 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ANN] Cash For Documentation project
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Jack Keel wrote:
> > >
> > > > Are there comment guidelines somewhere?
> > >
> > > Apart from what's in the image, I don't think so.
> > >
> > > > The present comments look awful in Dandelion because it must do a
<pre>
> > > > around them to maintain any formatting that does exist which results
in
> > > > very, very long lines.  Is Dandelion even accepted as a good way to
> > > > browse (i.e., would comments formatted for Dandelion be accepted by
the
> > > > Squeak Browser lovers?).
> > >
> > > Dandelion could do better than <pre>. Look here, for example:
> > > http://swiki.gsug.org:8888/browser/
> > >
> > > One concrete example would be this:
> > > http://swiki.gsug.org:8888/browser/comment?class=Heap
> > >
> > > While the formatting of tabs is not too nice, it's still readable. It
> > > would be a nice little project to convert tab-formatted comments into
> > > pretty HTML ...
> > >
> > > -- Bert
>
>