We're chatty?

Delbert Murphy dmurphy at infratecture.com
Tue Apr 1 14:45:22 UTC 2003


or just inquisitive?

I'm just thankful no one embeds pop-ups in my email...

---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:07:21 +0200
>From: Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de>  
>Subject: Re: We're chatty?  
>To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-
dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>isn't there too much advertising all around??
>On Tuesday 01 April 2003 13:19, Bruce ONeel wrote:
>> Some folks on the ll1-discuss at ai.mit.edu list think we're chatty!
>> How could they ever get that idea...
>> ll1 was a little languages conference.  The list is interesting if
>> you find languages interesting, else it has
>> to be very boring.  They aren't as chatty as we are.
>> ------
>> Michael Vanier <mvanier at cs.caltech.edu> wrote:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/squeak/message/58516?threaded=1
>> Warning!  This mailing list gives a whole new meaning to the term "high
>> bandwidth".  Squeakers are a very talkative lot ;-)  One example of what
>> hardware might be useful for is extremely fast method lookups.
>Marco Paga, mail at marco-paga.de , http://www.marco-paga.de
>GnuPG Key ID: 0xCD8E7612

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list