[BUG ] Weakness weakness in 3.6alpha ClassBuilder (
[cd][et] verynaive fix )
bvukmer at blackboard.com
Thu Apr 3 02:19:01 UTC 2003
Actually, since my fix was *very* naive, I hesitated to post it as a [FIX]. Probably good to do, though, to give the bug more visibility..
Thanks for the friendly help, Doug.
From: Doug Way [mailto:dway at riskmetrics.com]
Sent: Wed 4/2/2003 6:49 PM
To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Subject: Re: [BUG ] Weakness weakness in 3.6alpha ClassBuilder ( [cd][et] verynaive fix )
I notice you replied with a fix to your bug report with the same subject line
and a comment between parentheses.
The only problem is that this keeps your fix on the SQBUGS (bug reports) page,
not the SQFIXES where it should be. Probably you should just post a new
message (or reply) with [FIX] in the subject line instead, so that it shows up
on SQFIXES. I guess you would lose the connection to the original bug report,
but that's okay.
See both pages:
- Doug Way
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 3183 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20030402/10635c59/attachment.bin
More information about the Squeak-dev