No, no no. "more user friendly" just doesn't cut it. Are you quite sure
a different logical rule will cause no more confusion? do you have a
concrete suggestion or at least a specific direction for the new layout
you want?

I'm not being arbitrarily difficult here - I already gave it my best
shot at making it user friendly. I realize that you may see thing
differently, but I won't be enlightened by "more user friendly".

Daniel

Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
> I got what you mean, but should the filter for all installed packages 
> "overlay" in some way the other filter for new versions? perhaps changing the 
> layout of th epackage loader a bit to be a bit more user firendly.
> 
> marco
> 
> On Friday 04 April 2003 15:01, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > You are. Browsing the code can dissipate worlds of anxiety (though it
> > might take some looking to find the right thing to browse).
> >
> > SMLoader>>packageList
> >
> > 	^(self packages) select: [:e | self filter allSatisfy: [:currFilter |
> >
> > 		(self perform: currFilter) value: e]]
> >
> > You can see the filter definitions in the "filters" category of the same
> > class.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Hmm. I really don't understand one option: "display new or newer
> > > packages". I had to use this together with the option: "display installed
> > > packages". Showing just installed packages should show me the SPrevayler
> > > package if it is on my system no matter the other option (whatever it
> > > should mean), or am i missing a very important point?
> > >
> > > regards
> > > marco
> > >
> > > On Friday 04 April 2003 09:51, goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:
> > > > Marco Paga <mail at marco-paga.de> wrote:
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday 03 April 2003 16:24, Marcus Denker wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:14:32PM +0200, Marco Paga wrote:
> > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > sorry but: nope, I can't see it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe this is because you use 3.4gamma? The Package loader
> > > > > > only shows the packages that are registerd for specific
> > > > > > versions (in this case 3.4, 3.5, 3.6). Maybe 3.4gamma is
> > > > > > not recognized as 3.4?
> > > > >
> > > > > it must be the package loader of 3.4gamma. I worked aorund with every
> > > > > possible configuration, but my package seems not to be there.
> > > >
> > > > Eh, are you sure? I mean, *really* sure? :-) The reason I ask is
> > > > because I see it but I *did* have to look for it - since it is called
> > > > "SPrevayler" instead of "Sprevayler" it sorts itself right after "SM
> > > > Package Loader".
> > > >
> > > > regards, Göran
> > >
> > > - --
> > > Marco Paga, mail at marco-paga.de , http://www.marco-paga.de
> > > GnuPG Key ID: 0xCD8E7612
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> > >
> > > iD8DBQE+jWxqlI77o82OdhIRAoMMAJ9WkFfGdLV8JvymjuwFh8IoUynEkACg0DPy
> > > MNHQMg6y1INZicY0H0lHZYg=
> > > =7jvq
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> -- 
> Marco Paga, mail at marco-paga.de , http://www.marco-paga.de
> GnuPG Key ID: 0xCD8E7612