Need feedback on simple idea
jwelton at pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu
Mon Apr 14 14:53:04 UTC 2003
Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
> It has been done. You end up with a programming language that some
> people find elegant and highly usable, and some people find "simplified"
> to the point of making it hard to use. This is already known. What
> new information about the desirability or practicality of the change
> would be obtained by making this change to a Smalltalk compiler?
While it may not be new research in isolation, it seems like a natural
direction to pursue in conjunction with their other research. It
seems particularly relevant to the Traits work, in which the use of
ivars is somewhat restricted. So, I think it's a fine thing for them
to explore, but I also agree with the more conservative responders
that issues like encapsulation and specialized accessors need to be
addressed for it to have any hope of being a practical improvement
over Smalltalk as it is.
More information about the Squeak-dev