Distributed Squeak

Michael van der Gulik mikevdg at hetnet.nl
Tue Apr 15 17:57:10 UTC 2003


Thanks for the feedback, all. I'll be away for Easter, but I'll be 
reading up and linking things to the web-site after then.

goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:

>Well, if I were you I would do two things:
>
>1. Take a hard look at Magma.
>  
>
Will do.

>2. Talk with Stephen Pair and Craig Latta.
>
Well, if they're on this list I'm sure they'll gladly answer any call 
for help.

>Magma is a GemStone kindof OODB for Squeak and does give multiple
>running Squeaks a common transactional object memory.
>
I haven't looked at Magma.. yet.. but if it's an OODB then it's more or 
less just for storage, right? That's an important part of what I want to 
achieve, but the more important part is getting remote messaging and 
object replication working. That's tricky.

>Stephen is also building stuff in this vein and has demonstrated "remote
>object memories" at OOPSLA etc. He has also done modifications to the VM
>to better facilitate these systems (like dirty marking etc). And a bunch
>of other stuff too. :-)
>
Does anybody have a link for this? It's a bit hard to find.

>Well, please do look carefully at the stuff that is out there before
>duplicating work. But I think that combining some form of "remote
>message sending" with Magma would get you very far. Or perhaps something
>using Stephen's work.
>
I shall.

Michael.




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list