Hi Romain, first of all, I am using BrowseUnit and I like a lot, thank you!

Now the question: why did you change the generation of the selectors?

I don't like the way it is generating them now, but may be there is a reason
I don't get. For example, let's say I have a method called #Add: anObject.
Version 2 used to generate the test method #testAdd, but version 3 generates
#testAddA1. I think the previous one was clearer and now it is not backward
compatible, as you said.

Thanks!

======================================
Daniel Altman
Buenos Aires, Argentina


"rrobbes" <rrobbes at etu.info.unicaen.fr> wrote in message
news:20030724142352.16320.qmail at rantanplan.info.unicaen.fr...
>
> Hi all,
>
> I uploaded a new version of BrowseUnit yesterday :
>
> from the readme :
>
> BrowseUnit is a package which improve the integration
> of unit tests in developpement.  A browser have been oppened
> to let you try it out.
>
> It's features are :
>
>  - Automatic generation of TestCase for classes.
>  - Automatic generation of test methods.
>  - Easy navigation between tests and tested code.
>  - Improved running of tests, and debugging of failures or errors.
>  - Modification of the Browser to display BrowseUnit functionalities.
>
> There have been a few changes since v2, mainly :
>
>  - Generation of tests methods improved, it now takes into account all
> the parameters of the original method.
>  - Navigation improved for several arguments methods and class-side
methods.
>  - SLint now runs in the background, allowing you to do something when
> checking your code.
>  - Less verbosity : no more yes/no questions where 'yes' was always what
you
> wanted.
> Your mouse is happier !
>  - The browser buttons update more often.
>  - You're spared a few clicks while you debug assertion failures :-).
>  - The implementation is better factored : most of the code has been moved
> out
> of Browser, letting just the GUI improvements there. That way, BrowseUnit
is
> more
> easily adaptable to other browsers (Have you ever heard of WhiskerPlusPlus
?
> :-) ).
>
>
> Note: as I have made quite a few changes, feedback is welcomed,
> especially if they disturb you ... I'm mainly thinking of
> the suppression of most of the yes/no questions.
> Another thing : since the generation of the selectors have changed,
> the navigation is not backward compatible. Yell very loudly if
> you want it :-) ...
>
>    Romain
>
>