[Q] Isn't 'file://foo/bar' asUrl supposed to give a relative FileUrl?

[Q] Isn't 'file://foo/bar' asUrl supposed to give a relative FileUrl?

Michael Rueger m.rueger at acm.org
Wed Aug 6 17:14:17 UTC 2003

Previous message: [Q] Isn't 'file://foo/bar' asUrl supposed to give a relative FileUrl?
Next message: [Q] Isn't 'file://foo/bar' asUrl supposed to give a relative FileUrl?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hmm, what about using URIs instead? And the dozens of tests coming with it?
The current URL class hierarchy is one big hack and hugely abused all 
over the  system IMHO.
That's why I did the URI package in the first place ;-)

Michael

Previous message: [Q] Isn't 'file://foo/bar' asUrl supposed to give a relative FileUrl?
Next message: [Q] Isn't 'file://foo/bar' asUrl supposed to give a relative FileUrl?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list