For me I will continue to post the changesets in the wiki page so that 
we are sure that we have all the list and that we can rely on another 
source.


On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 01:58 PM, Roel Wuyts wrote:

> I see no immediate problems from moving to BFAV, but I will discuss 
> with Alex and we will notify you as soon as possible. I had an 
> afternoon meeting with Alex anyway :-)
>
> On Friday, Aug 8, 2003, at 13:05 Europe/Zurich, Daniel Vainsencher 
> wrote:
>
>> Brent Vukmer <bvukmer at blackboard.com> wrote:
>>> The BFAV originally modelled the current harvesting process very 
>>> closely.  Trying to extend it to also model the project-Swiki-page 
>>> process makes the BFAV packages more complicated, increases the 
>>> amount of QA I Should Be Doing, etc. Frankly I just don't know if 
>>> it's needed.  I may just remove the functionality.  Is anybody else 
>>> using the KCP Viewer?  Any votes for keeping it?
>>
>> The KCP team could, IMO, now use the regular process using the BFAV,
>> since the BFAV itself allows *[KCP]* filters, but that's up to them.
>> Either way, I vote for dropping it. The Swiki is used mostly by the 
>> KCP
>> team and myself (since I do the final approval most of their work). I
>> don't mind checking their stuff out using their own tools, and it is
>> definitely not as important as the BFAV itself. Since the BFAV is
>> currently doing an important job, and quite a few people are using it,
>> its simplicity is important.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
> Roel Wuyts                                                   Software 
> Composition Group
> roel.wuyts at iam.unibe.ch                       University of Bern, 
> Switzerland
> http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~wuyts/
> Board Member of the European Smalltalk User Group: www.esug.org
>
>