I agree at 200%. Drop it this is too important for Squeak and the 
harvesting process.

Stef
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 01:05 PM, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:

> Brent Vukmer <bvukmer at blackboard.com> wrote:
>> The BFAV originally modelled the current harvesting process very 
>> closely.  Trying to extend it to also model the project-Swiki-page 
>> process makes the BFAV packages more complicated, increases the 
>> amount of QA I Should Be Doing, etc. Frankly I just don't know if 
>> it's needed.  I may just remove the functionality.  Is anybody else 
>> using the KCP Viewer?  Any votes for keeping it?
>
> The KCP team could, IMO, now use the regular process using the BFAV,
> since the BFAV itself allows *[KCP]* filters, but that's up to them.
> Either way, I vote for dropping it. The Swiki is used mostly by the KCP
> team and myself (since I do the final approval most of their work). I
> don't mind checking their stuff out using their own tools, and it is
> definitely not as important as the BFAV itself. Since the BFAV is
> currently doing an important job, and quite a few people are using it,
> its simplicity is important.
>
> Daniel
>