I agree. (modulo the Squeak-L stuff).

Stef

On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 08:04 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 12:03:49PM -0700, Chris Muller wrote:
>>
>> I haven't tried the RefactoringBrowser since.. 3.4 or so.  I ran into 
>> some kind
>> of compatibility issue..  can't remember what it was right now.
>>
>> I hope it has been fixed because I really like the Lint tool.  As for 
>> the rest
>> of it, my main problem with it was the rewrite of the browsers 
>> instead of
>> integration into the existing browsers.  Some enhancements I've become
>> accustomed to in the standard browsers were unavailable in the 
>> Refactoring
>> browsers and I would frequently find myself in the wrong type of 
>> browser.
>>
> I think It would be nice to actually move the Rafactoring browser in
> the image. There are manu reasons:
> 1) It's no module. It's a patch.
> 2) Lots of the subsystems of RB have allready counterparts in the 
> image,
> these should get integrated. e.g. it has a parseTree that is much more
> nicely to work with than the standard squeak one (and which are used by
> the closurecompiler). If we integrate it with the system, it could use
> the standard Scanner/parser. Same for other parts.
> Some Tools (Lint) could be made packages. And the Tests really needs 
> to be
> in its own package.
>
>   Marcus
>
>
>
> -- 
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
>
>