tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
Sat Aug 16 20:00:51 UTC 2003
"Pixel" <pixel at quantumchamaeleon.com> wrote:
> Regarding clean-room rewrites ... Just how many on this list would be
> qualified to perform the actual rewrite, since the definition of clean-room
> pretty much implies that the work is being done by someone that has not
> looked at the original code?
Exactly. It's not worth spending a single brain cycle on. Ain't gonna
There's only two possibilities
a) persue amendment of the license
b) live with it
i) by coping with the current squeakL
ii) by just not doing squeak
Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
A low level language is one whose programs require attention to the irrelevant.
More information about the Squeak-dev