Daniel Vainsencher wrote:

> Ok, I created a proposal/FAQ. Please, anyone joining in, read it before
> you do.
> It is at - http://swiki.squeakfoundation.org/squeakfoundation/103
> Those already in the fray, please read it and let me know if anything
> there seems wrong/incomplete, whatever.

You write "I" but did not sign it. I see that as invitation to add ;-)

Ordering: SqueakL should go on top (1.2->1.1), as it is the current license.

1.3: You do not state the difference of BSD and MIT, with a slight 
preference for BSD du to the court trial, yet in 4. you propose MIT. Why?

Add 1.5: "However, SqueakL is free for all practical purposes. That 
means you can download, use, and modify Squeak as you wish and 
distribute or even sell your own Squeak-based projects. If your 
published projects changes something in existing classes or the Virtual 
Machine, you have to publish those changes in source code, but any 
additions may be kept private." I put this on the Swiki right away.

2.2: There were companies whose lawyers did not have problems with 
SqueakL as it stands. So your statement is not correct.

4: Did we agree on MIT? I think there should at least be some sort of 
vote. I'm not opposed to this, but since I do not exactly know the 
difference of MIT vs. BSD I hope others do ;-)

-- Bert