Wishes for 3.7

Wishes for 3.7

Stephane Ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Mon Aug 18 19:29:36 UTC 2003

Previous message: [Q] Isn't 'file://foo/bar' asUrl supposed to give a relative FileUrl?
Next message: when to integrate Flow (was "Wishes for 3.7")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hi all

I was just wondering: 3.6 got a lot of good rewrite such as the network 
part.
Now I was wondering if 3.7 could benefit from Flow. I raise the 
question but I'm not expert
in Stream and I did not look at Flow. Is this idea is stupid or the 
Streams could be drastically improve and Flow could be the answer?

Stef

Previous message: [Q] Isn't 'file://foo/bar' asUrl supposed to give a relative FileUrl?
Next message: when to integrate Flow (was "Wishes for 3.7")
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list